Activity

Hi Geni,

I, too, find the Quality Matters (QM) rubric to be very comprehensive. (In full disclosure, I am a QM Face-To-Face Facilitator.) The rubric is based on a comprehensive literature review, and the annotations provide excellent rationale and examples for meeting the standards outlined in the rubric. The QM process is equally impressive. Faculty can evaluate their courses on their own or receive peer feedback for enhancing their courses, and the goal is for every course to eventually meet the QM rubric standards.

Here is more information about Quality Matters ([url]https://www.qualitymatters.org/qa-resources/rubric-standards/higher-ed-rubric[/url]) for anyone who is interested.