Activity

Hi Everyone,
I mentioned UF’s "pay it forward" model of quality assurance course review at the TopKit workshop. In case you are wondering how we are coming along with that process, here’s a summary:
The idea is that a faculty completes the course review process which requires:

• A self review done by the course instructor
• An Ally…

[Read more]

This is something of a tangent, but has anyone seen [b]policies or regulations[/b] regarding whether instructors must provide a downloadable (i.e., for offline viewing) copy of videos owned by the instructor and/or institution and hosted on the institution’s Kaltura instance (or other dedicated video hosting tool)? We had a student insist that he…[Read more]

Hi Shelly,
As an Instructional Designer without a PhD (and no current plan to pursue a PhD), I find research intimidating. In the past few months I have been working as Co-PI on a 360 video research project that is funded by an internal Seed Grant at my institution, the University of South Florida, Sarasota-Manatee. For this project I am…[Read more]

Thanks, Charlotte! The interaction section is particularly appropriate, as with QM. I’ll take a closer look.

Joe

Hi Joe,

Have you checked out SUNY’s opensource rubric OSCQR? http://oscqr.org/ I think some of it may be a great fit for what you’re looking for— especially the ‘Content & Activities’ and ‘Interaction’ sections.

The scorecard is pretty thorough: https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/consult/oscqr-course-design-review/

Plus, OSCQR has not only…[Read more]